HomeРазвлеченияRelated VideosMore From: LastWeekTonight

Net Neutrality: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)

172091 ratings | 14336578 views
Cable companies are trying to create an unequal playing field for internet speeds, but they're doing it so boringly that most news outlets aren't covering it. John Oliver explains the controversy and lets viewers know how they can voice their displeasure to the FCC. (www.fcc.gov/comments, for any interested parties) Connect with Last Week Tonight online... Subscribe to the Last Week Tonight YouTube channel for more almost news as it almost happens: www.youtube.com/user/LastWeekTonight Find Last Week Tonight on Facebook like your mom would: http://Facebook.com/LastWeekTonight Follow us on Twitter for news about jokes and jokes about news: http://Twitter.com/LastWeekTonight Visit our official site for all that other stuff at once: http://www.hbo.com/last-week-tonight-with-john-oliver It's HBO.
Html code for embedding videos on your blog
Text Comments (9147)
Attikissmybutt CEnA (3 days ago)
RIP
bnaof0982n (6 days ago)
And we just discovered that Ajit Pai lied about a DDOS attack against the comment site; an excuse used to ignore all public comments that were placed on it.
Jason Lennerth (6 days ago)
The internet is a public good and should not give competitive advantages to any organization willing to pay more. It would be an inherently unjust system, with established companies having the capital to secure high speed data traffic highways, while start ups with possibly improved products or business models, that have less capital, left with slower traffic lanes. You really want to make it fair, give the businesses that pay an extra surcharge a short term advantage but use those extra funds to build gigabyte per second nation wide internet highways that will, in the long term, flatten the disadvantage of companies with less capital because the basic infrastructure would be developed to provide gigabyte per second download and upload speed, which would level out any advantages for large cap companies would get in the short teem for paying to build out a better/faster data system made of fiber optic cables. First gigabyte (GB)/per sec, then terabyte (TB)/per sec universal speeds nation wide.
default 4300 (11 days ago)
#FUCKTHEDIRections they love the terrorists
YoungManDub (11 days ago)
Why do you think you're so relevant?!
dorcas (12 days ago)
𝗨𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗱𝗱𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗨𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗟𝗮𝘄 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝘁𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗘𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗜𝗻 𝟯 𝗠𝗶𝗻𝘂𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘀𝘀𝘀 𝗣𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗮𝘆 >>https://t.co/iwLrU6RZzP?bert55xew33sdf43
Not_My_Name (15 days ago)
Anyone else notice that Youtube wants $19.99 to watch this show in HD?
Dibyo Ghosh (18 days ago)
Apartment 3B. Hmmm. Does this mean that Lex Luther and Superman live in the same building as Ross Geller?
LindaCreations (30 days ago)
omg i love this guy XD even when i don't understand what hes talking about i still laugh
hero night Beyond (1 month ago)
You're right let's fight back but not in violence but in words they use are Firepower to win net neutrality
Andy Fox (1 month ago)
This fear mongering sure didn't age well
They predicted this... I want a part 2 where they talk about Ajit Pai.
Wooo_gaming (1 month ago)
Estonias not scared of shrek its scared of Russia
Unconventional Man (1 month ago)
Believe it or not his Lex Luthor reference has sort of happened before. Ex. Earth 2
BigBoss20 (1 month ago)
I would totally sign up for Nutflix tbh
Zachary Woodford (1 month ago)
And just like people with a brain knew all along nothing changes with or without net neutrality
Dat Fishe Boi (1 month ago)
Welp, the son of a bitch did it.
Rajat Daki (1 month ago)
ha ha ha fucking asshole americans still fighting for net neutrality shame on you bastards go home and fuck your mother because your dad was in bed with your sister ha ha ha #moronamerica
Attikissmybutt CEnA (3 days ago)
English mothafucka do you speak it?
Rebecca -_- (27 days ago)
*Rajat Daki* 😂🤣 What?
Animating Alex (1 month ago)
Too bad it actually happened.
rutabagasteu (1 month ago)
The Internet slow down started the day Net Neutrality ended.
potato psoas (2 months ago)
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Senators-Press-Ajit-Pai-on-DDOS-Attack-His-Agency-Made-Up-141999
Ellijah Burgos (2 months ago)
And so it ends.
Dopplegänger (2 months ago)
That was actually pretty epic
Querty Uiop (2 months ago)
2:23 Really? It always works for me
GamingSoul97 (2 months ago)
FUCK AJIT PAI NET NEUTRALITY ENDS TOMMOROW
nateisanerd (2 months ago)
The thumbnail is a good representation of how I feel about the state of net neutrality right now
Lizzie mo (2 months ago)
*READ THIS IF YOU WANT TO SAVE NET NEUTRALITY!* A few weeks ago the FCC announced NetNeutrality ends on June 11 unless we stop it. Click the link to write your lawmakers https://www.battleforthenet.com/
tails doll comic (3 months ago)
10:54
Greg Savacool (3 months ago)
We thought Tom wheeler was bad, look at Ajit Pai.
immortal Fennec Fox (3 months ago)
"Go see what the real worlds aboot" John oliver
Blacktemplar Drenoth (3 months ago)
can I kill the Heretics sir?
fear rejectz (3 months ago)
LETS DO DIS MADAFAKAS LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Grace Font (3 months ago)
yo is there a way that people can find the transcript from this video online without having to contact HBO directly? i've looked online but all i find is news reports from when FCC site crashing after this came out.
KhondorFlex (3 months ago)
I wonder if John Oliver would sing the same tune today since the Left is trying so hard to protect net neutrality these days. This is a great example of how money drives politics and media.
Luis Blas (3 months ago)
...so imagine after this no one will care of whatching tv or even pay for internet? ...
Fraser Hall (3 months ago)
As an Aussie ur impersonation of our accent was comically bad
Thomas The Queen (4 months ago)
"Good evening monsters,"
Zach Hare (4 months ago)
We are fucked
Jennifer Stilton (4 months ago)
My bro forced me to watch this shi#
IAN 4000 (4 months ago)
It's funny, in hindsight, Tom Wheeler was a far better FCC chairman than Ajit Pai.
InternetRoDO (4 months ago)
“Good evening monsters” Me: “yessss”
Dave Liu (4 months ago)
"Comcast tried to ruin Colorado's internet with a video full of insane lies" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nKIYD_dJQc
Abd al-Rahman al-Ghafiqi (4 months ago)
5 Things You Need to Know About Fake Net Neutrality http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/04/03/5-things-need-know-fake-net-neutrality/ by Free Our Internet 3 Apr 2018 In 2015, Google used its influence over the Obama administration to pass sweeping federal government regulations over our modern internet networks. So-called “net neutrality” was subsequently sold to the public through a massive disinformation campaign, asserting that the rules as devised by Obama’s Federal Communications Commission (FCC) were necessary to ensure a “free and open internet.” Unfortunately, that description couldn’t be further from the truth. So-called net neutrality rules instead gave a false illusion of neutrality online and a false sense of protection. If anything, those rules singlehandedly weakened the free flow of information by empowering the world’s most powerful online companies like Google, Facebook and Twitter to censor speech, filter and manipulate information and abuse the collection of your personal data with absolutely no transparency or accountability. Here is how. Fake Net Neutrality Doesn’t Apply to Google and Facebook Net neutrality rules only apply to internet service providers (ISPs) like Verizon and Comcast. They do not, nor have they ever, been applied to the largest internet companies in the world – Google, Facebook, Twitter and Amazon. Net neutrality is the principle that all data on the internet should be treated the same. However, the fake net neutrality purposefully excluded Silicon Valley internet companies, rendering them free to block and discriminate against content. Fake Net Neutrality Allows for Online Censorship and Less Transparency Fake net neutrality only applies to ISPs, not massive communications platforms like Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Google. Those platforms now have almost total control over online information and are now blocking access to content, censoring or shutting out users and manipulating what data consumers can and can’t see online. This is increasingly becoming standard practice for Silicon Valley. Proponents of Obama’s net neutrality often cite a dozen “examples” of ISPs blocking or throttling since 2005, but each case is extremely weak, was immediately fixed, or was a network management issue. However, in the 2.5 years the fake net neutrality rules were in place, social media giants like Facebook, YouTube and Twitter have repeatedly been caught censoring content (primarily from conservatives), blocking, banning or demonetizing users, and abusing user data with little transparency. They even work with foreign governments to silence voices online that don’t fit political agendas. Fake Net Neutrality Was a Result of Google’s Cozy Relationship with Obama Google was the closest corporate ally of the Obama administration – enjoying more access to the former president, staff and regulators than any other business in America. In fact, then-Google Chairman Eric Schmidt helped to elect the former president, ironically by scraping the same type of personal data Cambridge Analytica accessed. The fake net neutrality rules were passed in conjunction with Google’s frequent lobbying visits to the Obama White House. It was during all of these visits that Obama instructed the FCC – an independent agency – to adopt rules put in place in 1934 for government monopolies. After this unprecedented meddling, the FCC changed course and adopted Google’s Obama’s preferred regulations. During the short time that those rules were in place, Google and Facebook censorship skyrocketed, transparency continued to take a nose dive, and deep-hidden algorithms continued to manipulate the information users see online. Fake Net Neutrality Ignores the Near-Monopoly Power of Google and Facebook Google’s Chrome browser enjoys 65 percent market share in the US, with Internet Explorer coming in second at only 9 percent. Google’s search engine dominates with 88.26 percent of the market. Facebook dominates social media with nearly 80 percent of the market. And Google and Facebook account for 73 percent of all digital advertising in the United States. Google’s dominance across platforms, services and hardware alone is an unprecedented demonstration of power. Fake net neutrality was pushed on the premise that it was necessary to deal with monopolistic internet gatekeepers. If we are to take that seriously, then clearly real net neutrality must apply to those with actual market power – Google and Facebook. Not only does their power demonstrate an ability to harm competition, but more importantly, we have already seen how they exercise this power to tamper with unfettered access to information online. Congressional Efforts to Protect Fake Net Neutrality by Passing the CRA Undermine Any Chance of Real Net Neutrality Protections Democrats led by Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) are seeking to reinstate the Silicon Valley/Obama fake net neutrality rules by the use of an obscure legislative tool – the CRA. Any successful use of the CRA would continue to exempt Facebook and Google from any rules that; prohibit blocking and censoring content; require enhanced transparency; or discriminate against lawful online users, services and applications. The Internet Association (which represents Google, Twitter, Facebook, etc.) states that net neutrality is necessary to ensure there is “no unreasonable interference/disadvantage” and that “practices that unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage the ability of consumers to reach the internet content, services, and applications of their choosing,” should be examined or prohibited, if necessary. That sounds great, so why are lawmakers trying to carve out the largest global companies that have a hand in virtually all online communications? The only way to have real net neutrality is to apply these rules to the internet’s largest information gatekeepers, so Congress should do what they were elected to do and write legislation that protects their constituents, not their corporate donors out west. To learn more about the fake net neutrality being considered by Congress, go to www.FreeOurInternet.org
Luke Lanich (4 months ago)
Oh crap the interwebs is gonna be ruined without net neutrality, oh wait, nothing happened. Good job. Literally nothing.
Tee Krieger (4 months ago)
Lob'buying Loop=Sellers.... ring ring ring Bingo dotties - next dotkong? ehm dotcom boooooooooobietraps
scoyt d (4 months ago)
This graaaaappppphhhhh! Ridiculous accent, boring dickhead!
Jon dow (4 months ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2HWmgHyZtQ
Jon dow (4 months ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1n53Uc5aMds
Rich Peacock (4 months ago)
John Oliver is a soyboy Establishment cuck & an embarrassment to Britain.
mdudegamer (4 months ago)
Hey now, don't be hating on Caillou. We all know he grew up and changed his name to Saitama and you DON'T want to get on his bad side.
Ankit Sharma (5 months ago)
2018 here
David Vezzoli (5 months ago)
Estonia may sound like a silly country to Americans but as far as the internet goes Estonia has one of the highest penetration rates in the world. Just sayin'!
Dimentive (5 months ago)
This video is four years old. Holy shit.
jason9022 (5 months ago)
make Ronald donald drumpf again
dsahgkg (5 months ago)
gone now
DIESEL0759 (5 months ago)
Crying shame John Oliver won't ever see a network gig. He's hilariously snarky, but I'm not sure the NBCs/ABCs/CBSs of the world are prepared for him.
DIESEL0759 (5 months ago)
+jaime martinez I'm not sure about the money stuff, but I agree on less restrictions
jaime martinez (5 months ago)
DIESEL0759 this is way better for him, better pay, more budget and less restrictions
Justin Kirschenman (5 months ago)
Net neutrality was only neutral for large corporations
Peter Parker (5 months ago)
If we love our internet so much then why won't we improve it?
Peter Parker (5 months ago)
This is another reason why we need an all new Congress. So they will do things that we want and do need.
Peter Parker (5 months ago)
Near monopolies are the new mafia. They have little competition and can be shittier.
Storm1001 (5 months ago)
We don’t have it anymore
Julian H. (5 months ago)
"Find out what the world's aboot!" I bloody died!
Kappa Luppa (6 months ago)
Anyone who has John Oliver as their spokesman is assured I'll vote for the other guy...
Kim Jong Un (6 months ago)
Bah dum tsssss
Matthew Graham (6 months ago)
For all of you millions and millions of Americans who don't at all understand net neutrality, economics, or freedom, this is a better explanation of why netflix service was throttled. If you don't think that the companies using the most bandwidth should pay the most, who do you think should be subsidizing them? Should smaller startup companies be footing the bill? Perhaps tax dollars that don't exist? http://www.extremetech.com/computing/177073-why-netflix-streaming-is-getting-slower-and-probably-wont-get-better-any-time-soon
james evarts (6 months ago)
adsf
No Hope Equals no fear (6 months ago)
who thumbs down this video?
Jack Bartlett (6 months ago)
Everyone. A moment of solemn reflection. And a moment of TOTAL FUCKING RAGE THAT THOSE MOTHERFUCKING FCC SHITHEADS KILLED NET NEUTRALITY
Ishaan T (6 months ago)
When this video was posted 3 years ago, Jon Oliver was heavily criticized for misleading his audience as according to his critics, the federal courts and government would never allow net neutrality to be repealed. HAAHAHAHAHAHAH THE IRONYYY
Katherine Albee (6 months ago)
The thumbnail for this video is golden.
Robin Banks (6 months ago)
dumb.
Nikhil Vincent (6 months ago)
That night when the show aired, the FCC website crashed with folks petitioning in favour of net neutrality and a few years later a law was enacted reinforcing net neutrality. Its because of this show that the conversation on net neutrality became global. In my country India too net neutrality became the rage when it was exposed it was already affected and things changed for better all triggered by this show. That's the power of comedy!
Shreyan Joshi (6 months ago)
What the fuck, why are people laughing at this. This is some serious shit. I watched the whole video wide-eyed.
Beaky (6 months ago)
It's a humorous look at American politics and the status of a free and open internet. It's also a well researched and intelligent piece that few other popular media outlets have done justice. A number of John Oliver's shows are like this - they use comedy to inform the wider audience of a serious and pressing issue. If you found it engaging, it may be worth checking out some of his other shows.
Red Peony (6 months ago)
There's a word for net biasing- its called cheating. There are those who want a level playing field and those who want to cheat.
TheBigGuy3380 (6 months ago)
Transparency is a Liberal’s worst nightmare.
J T (7 months ago)
LOL Finding this at the start of 2018 is hilarious.
David Henson (7 months ago)
This is gate keeping power. Information, and the control of its distribution is deadly serious. Just wait and see. This can effect elections and disenfranchise millions. Elected officials should not be permitted to golf. Lobbying should be illegal. Wake upAmerica. Comcast is paying pennies on the dollar for every person who uses the Internet. It's not just spead, but content that shall be effected. Until their Netflix and porn gets cut off I doubt most will put down their poor and lube, and do something about this disaster. Good luck, America. You're going to need it!
Dorothy Turner (7 months ago)
Why are we doing this again?
MrWeedWacky (7 months ago)
FOPPING AWESOME AND FOP THE ISP'S
Asael Diaz (7 months ago)
Man we fucked up
bass0111 (7 months ago)
Here's the updated version from May 2017... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92vuuZt7wak
daboys1215 (7 months ago)
3 Years ago Obama did exactly what leftists are bitching about when Trump does it. The hypocrisy would be hysterical if not so pathetic.
Beaky (6 months ago)
Interestingly, they crashed the FCC website when Obama tried to do it. This isn't a left/right issue; the US fucked up royal.
Wwe Lover (7 months ago)
Tf is a leftist.
daboys1215 (7 months ago)
+Tooter Turtle: Certainly.
Tooter Turtle (7 months ago)
Yeah funny aint it?
Bernadette Brickley (7 months ago)
There are quite a few idiots of the internet, constantly commenting being the dumb things that they are. Unfortunately the dumb of man, are to stupid to understand when, there own stupidity and stupid internet actions, can be used by the horrids of man and their stupidity can be guided to favor whatever the horrids of man want. Even becoming under the thumb of the horrids of man. Whether it is for someone else to win an election or whatever one of the many horrids of man want. Which amongst man, there are quite a few horrids of man. Also amongst man there are quite few idiots. The horrids of man, will always use the idiots of man. Which there are alot more examples I can put in this comment of the horrids of man using the dumb of man, manipulating the dumb of man.
Tera Quabal (7 months ago)
I am all for the removal of Net Neutrality regulations! Here’s why: 1. The claim that the regulations make the Internet “neutral” are false, in fact it’s the opposite. The US Government is directly inhibiting the supply and demand that drives competition. This is not neutral in the least. 2. Competition is necessary for an environment to be innovative, especially in technology. 3. Further on the claim that the use of the term “neutral” is false: The big tech companies, companies such as Netflix, Google, Facebook, etc., massively benefit from the amount of money and content control that net neutrality regulations provide. 4. The barrier to entry in the e-commerce marketplace as a whole is so low that competition is almost completely wiped out. 5. Big tech companies lobby for these types of regulations for the sole purpose of further retaining profits and content control at the cost of the rest of the market place. Basically, although net neutrality regulations claim to provide a healthy market place, the reality is clearly the exact opposite. The businesses and consumers that are claimed to be protected are actually being exploited when these regulations were in place. Let me know if some of this logic is off, otherwise it is a sound argument!
handofstand (4 months ago)
+Tera Quabal Go back to school or go hit the books BIG TIME, you missed some very important concepts.
Beaky (6 months ago)
1. This argument could be made about literally any regulation. It is no more applicable to information than it is to food, debt, or education. 2. Are you trying to argue that the internet isn't sufficiently innovative? o.o 3. Net neutrality doesn't provide any content control. As you note, it minimizes barrier to entry, which maximizes competition. 4. As barriers to entry decrease, competition increases. It's why the idea of perfect competition requires zero barriers to entry and why there tends to be much less competition in something like telecommunications than there is in a low barrier industry like, for example, a pizzeria. 5. Repetition of point 4.
Martin Dawson (7 months ago)
🙄
Geo A (7 months ago)
f**ing hell john!! just EPIC !!!
ScarlettMoon (7 months ago)
The FCC has been doing this shit since 2007
AroundSun (7 months ago)
The FCC, net neutrality, and Marijuana being a schedule 1 drug is proof of the big government nanny state and the fact that we have a government which doesnt represent the people
Adam Onis (7 months ago)
Dude always read the iTunes user agreement, or you’ll end up like Kyle with your mouth sewed to someone’s ass
Phoenix Baker (7 months ago)
The coyote urine part gets me every time!
Kemuel Stewart (7 months ago)
Honestly, Netflix, Google and YouTube has very low operational cost; they’re mostly profit. The companies like Verizon and AT&T pay a large number of their operational cost because of the structure of the internet. It’s not evil that Netflix should have to pay for the load they have on Verizon, etc.. People need to understand that the internet is a tool not a depending resource.
handofstand (4 months ago)
Missed the point. This is about you, and about small businesses even more, getting charged for services based on their domain name or content type (which can be analyzed in real time), on top of what you or they pay for the *maximum* (not minimum) speeds for that level of service. It could be a consumer site. Or, it could be for Google Voice, which if you take the time to read, has much, much lower bandwidth requirements. It's something like 64kbps (kilobits (divide by 8 from large B (bytes))! That's why all of the phone plans, for phone calling ( *not* data) are unlimited now! https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/55471/how-much-bandwidth-does-a-phone-call-require-and-how-much-is-the-capacity-of-a-s The cable companies are making money for cable already in the ground and usually even make money leasing modems! There's so much you don't understand about this issue! Video streaming is only the beginning!
l555444333222 L5K (7 months ago)
We lost Net Neutrality now. You failed us, John...
Qflick (7 months ago)
Fuk me! Now that’s how u address an issue! 👏
RWeber108 (7 months ago)
Net Neutrality is a big issue and we must save it. But, isn't Calilou a cancer survivor? Isn't that why he's bald? Not sure, because that is an insanely boring show.
Joseph Carson (7 months ago)
I thought this shit came out in december 2017... I tried to leave a comment and now its just telephone numbers, these cock suckersare going to win the internet.
William Mellor (7 months ago)
Well Fuck that didn't work
0ccf123 (7 months ago)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CP1wDlpSVj0
powec12w (7 months ago)
Can't wait for part 3 now haha
Timothy Halloran (7 months ago)
John Oliver, Tax legislation and the Carried Interest loophole and the Capitol Gains, why is this personal income taxed at a lower rate than other forms of personal income??????????????????????
david jaffe (7 months ago)
Who is here after net neutrality was repealed 😭😭

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.
How to become bitcoin trader? Exactly like Bitcoin, multiple digital currencies exist in the marketplace. So if you prefer to buy a few other currencies which aren`t available on Indian Exchange than you can utilize Bittrex. All you have to do is locate an exchange that you favor. Cryptocurrency exchanges have a massive potential to modify peoples minds and opinions concerning cryptocurrencies generally speaking and their application in actual life. So even in the event the exchange is attacked, its still true that you have your money. Furthermore, the exchanges prepare each and every industry for Bitcoin expansion. Existing stock exchanges will also compete to be able to fulfill the users configuration requirements. Sooner or later later on, the prices will grow more equal, meeting somewhere in the middleyour profit is equivalent to the quantity of convergence. No matter how far it is from Kijun, it is likely to return and test that level at some point. The amount of bitcoin is perpetually changing. In the US, it is 1000 USD. Whats even better, seek the services of a seasoned lawyer or at least ask for an in depth consultation. So youve read the newspaper about the meteoric growth of crypto currencies including Bitcoin or Ripple. Then coming up with 1000s of exchange rates simply to go out and get groceries is nearly impossible. Many cities around the world provide a bitcoin ATM where you are able to trade cash for bitcoin. The cryptocurrency world isn`t efficient.