Writer and technologist Eric Sammons is welcomed back to The Daily Decrypt to discuss the concept of "sidechains" and whether -- in practice -- their use would be preferable to alternatives -- 'alt'ernatives like 'alt'-coins.
Check out our new channel! http://youtube.com/dashorg
Connect with us!
[RSS feed]: http://mix.chimpfeedr.com/5b92e-The-Daily-Decrypt
Wanna sponsor a show?
Get beta invite: http://changetip.com/wallet
'Unchained' article by Sammons: https://medium.com/@EricRSammons/unchained-altcoins-as-free-market-bitcoin-sidechains-3432d9d88ed6
Sammons' homepage: http://ericsammons.com
Sidechains whitepaper: https://www.blockstream.com/sidechains.pdf
'Barabass & The Happy Few' by Luca Rossi: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_6lOs1GDYs
See our addresses for Bitcoin, BitcoinDark, Bitshares, Dash, Dogecoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Monero, Neucoin, Nubits, Nxt, Peercoin & more at http://TheDailyDecrypt.com/Tip-Us
ProTip ready: 16YmPfNXChVXcuut8opkHfmfYw4mPNFD6B
Funny ... he believes that internet-money has to become stable in terms of price ... but users should jump bit/alt-coins in order to find the best innovations of future internet-money ... THAT WILL NOT WORK ... at least not without big price swings ...
I understand what you mean to say,
but if you spike the price of food and water in an emergency.. there are still "shortages".. the only difference is only those with enough wealth will get the food and the poor all die.
on another note, I believe that anything that is tied to something that can be created out of thin air then there will always be price fixing, only it will be done by volume instead.
this includes Bitcoin, but especially gold and silver... all these things are tied to the dollar, so that means that the banks can throw lots of cash dollars at it and fix the price where ever they want to.. based on the fact that the federal reserve can just print as much as it wants and is free to distribute it as they wish. I'm no sure on how to get around this
Andreas Antonopoulos explained it like this. TCPIP is resisting it's successor. They can't upgrade it. It won because it was first and good enough. Could you have Andreas back on to elaborate? Thanks.
It's great to see you covering this, Amanda! I have a few comments for your guest – for clarity, I work at Blockstream, and we published the Sidechains Whitepaper (http://blockstream.com/sidechains.pdf).
Sidechains aren't specifically trying to address scalability concerns, though they _can_ be used to alleviate pressure on a parent blockchain. However, this is definitely *not* their primary objective, and it's not clear how effective they'll be at this anyway – other solutions, such as the Lightning Network, much more directly address the scalability problem.
Sidechains are much more for the testing and deploying of new features, such as privacy-focused Confidential Transactions, without endangering a production network with a untested code or a network partition (a hard fork). For example, the Bitcoin network can test new upgrades, in production, without putting customer funds at risk – a great example of this has been Segregated Witness, which after being deployed to a public sidechain last year, has now been proposed for inclusion in Bitcoin.
Significant time and energy has been spent creating many other new features for Bitcoin, all of which can be tested using sidechains. These features are publicly available here: https://elementsproject.org/elements – in fact, we have bundled most of these features in a public sidechain, Alpha, which is where we've tested Confidential Transactions and the ever-popular Segregated Witness. Anyone can pick from this list and construct a new sidechain of their own: https://elementsproject.org/sidechains/creating-your-own.html
Furthermore, sidechains are not limited to the fixed peg model. In fact, there are many competing economic policies that can be deployed on a sidechain, including inflationary and deflationary models alike! Sidechains can have any number of policies, features, and attributes that differ from their parent chains in much the same way that alt-coins differ from one-another – the difference is that with sidechains, we gain the added benefit of allowing users of these systems to freely move between them.
It's clear we need to do a better job at making these clarifications. Suggestions would be appreciated!
+Eric Martindale I don't want to sound harsh. So don't take my words the wrong way (English isn't my first language). But if people want to protect Bitcoin, they should act accordingly (responsible) and do something about the scalability. Everything else sounds a bit like protectionism and we should be very careful with that.
+Eric Martindale thank you for the explanation. I would like to make one comment: You said the difference between sidechains and altcoins is that with the former users can move freely between them. What do you mean by that? It seems to me people also move freely between altcoins.
Eric Sammons is forgetting that the TCP protocol suite has been in use for over 40 years and is still the primary data transmission protocol - so he's quite wrong about "in no other technology has that ever happened".
And the value of side chain "coins" if they exist is not important because the success of a side chain is measured more on its performance (speed) and the growth of it's use (transaction volume) versus appreciation of it's market cap apart from the main/pegged coin.
The objective of a sidechain is to facilitate and speed up transferring value into and out of the main chain/coin. It is an intermediate entity. There is no need to have a market trading/manipulating the relative value of that entity. It does not have to be a publicly traded "coin" and there may be reasons why doing that does not help to primary goals. If bitcoin is a transmission protocol for the internet of value, then a sidechain to me seems like a "gateway" or router of value interconnecting that protocol. And a very fast gateway, perhaps more like a high speed cache/buffer.
I want Blockchain tech that is about what it creates not what others don't create. Currency Competition implies staying on top of your game, not talking shhhhh about others. The WE, not the me will be the currency winner of the day and then have to come strong with it the next day.
I envision a wallet system that will hold practically any kind of coin, and has a built-in in decentralized exchange. That way they all compete, and you can use it anywhere any of the coins is accepted, by simply doing an instant exchange.
You are doing a really good [email protected]*%ing job with the show and content. More Ethereum please...Slock it. Vunk, Augur, Casper, Homestead, UJOMusic, all coming and in active development...DASH sold out once already and will do it again. The Holy Grail of Scalability is going to be solved out of the Ethereum Camp, bet your Bitcoins on that!
If you want to be realistic and not bias to the currency any one person owns most of, I think litecoin is the obvious replacement for BTC if it fails! It's forked with no problems and has passed the test of time..... I had some monero and dash but I sold them bc I can't do anything with it but watch the price go down #MYOpinion
+Chase ThatCoin - Doing something with any alt coin is just a matter of a vendor (or Bitpay) adding a plugin. The bigger issue is the altcoin. And for comparisons sake, LTC has done terribly while XMR and Dash have done pretty good. I do like LTC though. I just think people have left LTC as it didn't bring a whole lot new and have made like no changes.
A dash dev can't say that sidechanes are the Future. If he would think so he wouldn't work on dash! I think Dash is the best altcoin by far!!! But bitcoin is the top and with sidechanes it will be for ever the number one with a 90% chance.
+striky - I have some Dash (as a hedge), but more Monero, as Dash has a lot more to risk - experimenting with POS and more importantly, it appears Dash has privacy issues. In this last one, your life may be at stake. I understand the best doesn'T always win...
+striky DASH should be deployed as a sidechain so Bitcoin users can move directly into it (and out of it) without an exchange! If we find that the DASH model works in the long term, let's import it into the main protocol.
Sidechains weren't created to solve scalability issues. They're main purpose is to allow more experimentation on new blockchains without having to create a new currency network.
The free market comments on altcoins also don't make very much sense. Sidechains still exist in the free market. Just because a sidechain exists doesn't mean people are going to want to use it. A free market is still created with sidechains added to Bitcoin. No one is forcing people to use Bitcoin over any other cryptocurrency network. More people using Bitcoin as a result of sidechains is simply the likely outcome of the free market. Not sure why this guy is saying altcoins are a more free market solution when both sidechains and altcoins are being developed in the free market. Why don't we just see which approach wins in the free market? Sidechains also aren't price fixing; they are extensions of Bitcoin. It's not fixing the price between two different assets; it's making the same asset more flexible and useful.
I 100% agree with your opinions. The only question is how they will make the sidechanes secure. maybe they implementing a option for a separate sidechane fee paying on the main bitcoin chain in the lock transaction and the sidechan miners compeat to claim that fee pool on the main chain.
How to become bitcoin trader? Exactly like Bitcoin, multiple digital currencies exist in the marketplace. So if you prefer to buy a few other currencies which aren`t available on Indian Exchange than you can utilize Bittrex. All you have to do is locate an exchange that you favor. Cryptocurrency exchanges have a massive potential to modify peoples minds and opinions concerning cryptocurrencies generally speaking and their application in actual life. So even in the event the exchange is attacked, its still true that you have your money. Furthermore, the exchanges prepare each and every industry for Bitcoin expansion. Existing stock exchanges will also compete to be able to fulfill the users configuration requirements. Sooner or later later on, the prices will grow more equal, meeting somewhere in the middleyour profit is equivalent to the quantity of convergence. No matter how far it is from Kijun, it is likely to return and test that level at some point. The amount of bitcoin is perpetually changing. In the US, it is 1000 USD. Whats even better, seek the services of a seasoned lawyer or at least ask for an in depth consultation. So youve read the newspaper about the meteoric growth of crypto currencies including Bitcoin or Ripple. Then coming up with 1000s of exchange rates simply to go out and get groceries is nearly impossible. Many cities around the world provide a bitcoin ATM where you are able to trade cash for bitcoin. The cryptocurrency world isn`t efficient.